Poland 1 – 0 Moldova: Smuda aims for stability

Poland's starting XI versus Moldova

A line up composed of Ekstraklasa based players taking on the Moldovan national team in Portugal shouldn’t get anyone too excited. Polish fans could look forward to seeing new players being blooded into the national team set up and trying to impress Franciszek Smuda and they could see if Smuda himself did anything differently based on the players at his disposal. Interestingly enough it seems like Smuda, after much experimentation in both tactics and players, is starting to settle on a style of play and wants to build consistency, even in B team friendlies.

License to roam

During the initial stages of the match fans were (mis)treated to a poor pitch and a poor level of play. The Polish squad seemed to lack any positional sense what so ever. Dawid Nowak would sometimes be up top as a lone striker and then drift to the right wing. Michal Kucharczyk would be all over the pitch, popping up on either wing or ahead of Nowak. And Dawid Plizga often started deep before bombing forward and sliding wide. It made for a confusing opening ten minutes before one could really see how the side lined up.

Those three aforementioned players were the most interesting. When the team initially set up it looked like a 4-3-3 similar to the one Smuda played against the Ivory Coast. However, with Plizga, Kucharczyk, and Nowak license to drift wherever it sometimes looked like a 4-2-3-1 or a 4-4-2 although we shouldn’t get caught up in trying to label the formation.  The interesting aspects were the individual instructions and tendencies of the players.The goal in fact came after Kucharczyk drifted to the right and Plizga bombed forward to the left to score a long range strike. While the keeper should have easily smothered the ball the point is Plizga got into a good position because Kucharczyk, who looked nervous on the ball, was energetic off it and created space. The young Legia forward did not have a good game but on his debut took up some interesting positions much like Ludovic Obraniak is allowed to do when given basically a free role when deployed on the wing.

Positional discipline

The other three players of Poland’s front six were much more static which is what allowed for the creative freedom of the previously mentioned trio. Ariel Borysiuk sat in the middle of the pitch calmly breaking down any attacks that attempted to come through the middle. In possession he played sideways balls and short passes to maintain possession and launch counter attacks. Poland’s midfield in this match functioned much like the usual Murawski-Matuszczyk-Mierzejewski trio. Borysiuk plays a similar game to Murawski while Plizga and Janusz Gol sort of split the duties that Matuszczyk and Mierzejewski do. Gol worked hard in the middle of the pitch to win the ball back and help out defensively on the left side while Plizga tried to press and offer offensive support. Szymon Pawlowski meanwhile was happy to stay on the right touchline and had a decent game creating chances while being positionally disciplined.

With Kucharczyk roaming all over the pitch it was no surprise that Poland’s left hand side was where Moldova were creating their chances. Hubert Wolakiewicz didn’t help the attack much but it is difficult to do so when there is no winger on your side to offer support. Gol tried his best, and I don’t think it’s a coincidence he played on the left side of midfield as opposed to Plizga as Gol would do a better job of insulating that side. Even still Moldova created a couple chances on our left wing that kept Sandomierski and the defense alert.

Consistency in tactics

Even though we were playing weaker opposition Smuda didn’t change his game plan too much. Defensively we were expected to get back into our shape at which point we would then choose when to press. Once we got ten men behind the ball Moldova were at a loss to try and break us down. Going forward we didn’t try to maintain possession for a long time and probe the Moldovan defense but rather attempted to catch them on the counter. We were fairly successful at doing this as the Moldovans pushed forward often and played a laughably high defensive line that would have been exploited on the score sheet if not for Nowak’s poor finishing. Some might question why we chose to play a counter attacking game against a side we could be expected to dominate possession but one must remember that come Euro 2012 we will likely be the worst side there so in a way it makes sense to work on this style.

Disjointed pressing

The pattern of play was set in the first half and continued into the second, Pawlowski did take over left wing duties from Kucharczyk as Jakub Rzezniczak came on and he offered more stability on the left side but being naturally right footed he still cut in often. Perhaps the only tactically interesting note of the second half was our pattern of pressing. As mentioned earlier we usually pressed once we got in our shape but like previous matches there were points where we pressed Moldova high up the pitch in an effort to win the ball back in a dangerous position. Usually it was Plizga who initiated it but there were times where he was the only one pressing and he got passed around easily and found himself out of position. Other times players followed his lead and Moldova were harried into losing the ball.  Clearly this is something that needs to and can be worked on by the squad after becoming more familiar with each other and with Smuda.

Conclusions

With nothing else tactically interesting to comment on the second half was more of a chance to critique individual players. Nowak was actually having a decent game building up play but looked awful near the box. Grzegorz Wojtkowiak really led the makeshift back four well while Piotr Celeban settled down after a shaky start. Sandomierski was likely our best player, save for one error that should have tied the game. The game featured average performances from most of the players and while it is difficult to say who (if any) makes the Euro 2012 squad it will be interesting to see if the A team plays the same style of play against Norway in a couple days.

Advertisements

4 responses to “Poland 1 – 0 Moldova: Smuda aims for stability

  1. I’m not sure if 4-3-3 is what Smuda wants to play. One year ago it was only possible solution for him but during this year he made almost everything to prove that he would like to play something else. We played 4-3-3 only against Ivory Coast, against Australia it was 4-2-3-1, against Cameroon 4-1-3-2, and against Bosnia reserves 4-1-4-1.

    Maybe the 4-3-3 is the best solution (hope it’s Smuda’s final choice), but two other things seem very strange to me:
    1. he’d wasted one year for looking for other solutions
    2. he is again in the starting point, but instead of (as in the start) playing football based on possesion, he prefers an overjoyed football, despite knowing that team needs to hold possesion and keep the ball away from very poor defence. In addition, such play can be good enough against Moldova, but if Smuda think we can outplay anybody basing only on counterattacks, it’s his huge mistake. He had enough time to change our style of play, but I’m afraid, we will play again chaotic football based on individuals.

    Nice review of the game, by the way, but i disagree with the point.

  2. Same as Andrzej, also I think that most of fans overrates Smuda in terms of using tactics, applying them in the team. Just… too much of it, for me. Good try though, keep it up!

  3. Pingback: Poland 1–0 Moldova: Tactics review

  4. Thanks for the replies guys! I appreciate all view points, sometimes one can run a danger of being too myopic.

    Smuda certainly needs to start figuring things out, one just hopes the past year has been him actively trying out new things but he could have just been attempting anything and everything trying to fall into something that works. Smuda seems to now be saying he’s settled on players and tactics so it will be interesting to see how we play tomorrow against Norway. It will obviously tell us more about the team and will be especially interesting since Mierzejewski will be out. Will he play a 4-3-3 with Obraniak sliding in to central midfield and Jelen on left wing or a 4-2-3-1 with Obraniak in the hole? Should be interesting…

    Again thanks for the comments!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s