Featured Term: Inverted Winger

Inverted wingers have established themselves as the latest and hottest trend in football. The Europa League final featured two sides who both adhered to fielding inverted wingers (Fulham with Simon Davies and Damien Duff and Atletico Madrid with Simao and Jose Reyes) while the Champions League final had a side playing with inverted wingers (Bayern Munich with Hamit Altintop and Arjen Robben) and another that deployed two natural strikers in wide areas (Inter Milan with Goran Pandev and Samuel Eto’o) which leads to many of the same phenomena associated with inverted wingers. On the international stage World Cup runners up Holland played with the aforementioned Robben on the right and Liverpool workhorse Dirk Kuyt on the left while winners Spain often had a right footed player on the left side in the form of David Villa, Pedro, or Andres Iniesta.

The definition of an inverted winger is simple; it is the playing of a winger on the side of his weaker foot. Prominent examples in modern football include Arjen Robben , Nani, and Adam Johnson. Some attacking players who are not exactly wingers but nonetheless often find themselves on their ‘non favoured’ side include Ronaldinho, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Lionel Messi. Clearly this is a tactic practiced by the best managers in the world at the best clubs with the best players, but why?

An inverted winger has some obvious consequences. He will usually cut in on his favoured foot making it easier to shoot. Arjen Robben, possibly the foremost inverted winger in the world, scores handfuls of goals for club and country by cutting to his left, beating the fullback, and striking with his immaculate left foot. It is also what made Villa so dangerous at the World Cup with a number of his goals coming off creating an angle from the left and striking with his favoured foot. The video below shows all of Robben’s 23 goals for Bayern Munich and it illustrates the advantage cutting in has (it also displays his set piece ability, change of pace, and movement which should dispel the notion he is a ‘one trick pony’). But to say that this is the main, let alone only advantage of an inverted winger is naïve. While Simon Davies may have scored for Fulham this weekend because his left sided role afforded him a better angle to strike with his right it is not what made Fulham so successful under Roy Hodgson last season.

Fulham made the finals of the Europa League last term beating the likes of Juventus along the way, all the while playing two wingers on their ‘wrong’ side. They were a side that had no business making it that far with the talent level they possessed but the side had many tactical nuances that allowed them to progress so far. Hodgson did a truly magnificent job and one tenet he stuck to was playing the right footed Davies on the left and the left footed Duff on the right. While Davies did score a beautiful right footed volley from his opposite wing in the final the true tactical value it served Hodgson’s less glamorous side was the narrowing of the pitch it provided. It is somewhat obvious to state, as the great Herbert Chapman once did in a roundabout way, that the central area of the pitch is the most dangerous. Width is often clamored for but the end game of creating width is to exploit the space it creates in the middle of the park. Inverted wingers naturally stay more central than their counterparts. This means they force the opposition wingers wide when they have possession and help protect the more dangerous areas. It is of course true that this means that the centre of the pitch can get congested but it is a tradeoff that Hodgson seemed fit to concede and no one can argue he put a hand wrong as manager at Craven Cottage.

When an inverted winger has the ability to naturally drift to the middle there are two things to note in regard to space. First it is plain to see that space is created wide on the inverted winger’s side. It is no coincidence that Alex Ferguson plays Patrice Evra behind Nani (and sometimes Park Ji-Sung) and John O’Shea supporting Antonio Valencia. Nani is adept at cutting in which leaves acres of space for the athletic and attackingly competent Evra. As Nani draws defenders to him into the middle of the field Evra rampages down the left hand touchline to provide the natural width vacated by Nani. On the other side Valencia is naturally right footed and he clings near the sideline. This leaves little room for the right back to exploit which means playing a conservative player such as O’Shea makes sense. O’Shea is often criticized for lack of creativity but he helps balance Ferguson’s formation, often providing cover to the backline of Manchester United when Evra springs forward as he is more than capable of playing as an auxiliary centre back. As the chalkboard below shows Valencia stayed much wider than Park versus Fulham, the chalkboard showing their passes. O’Shea was willing to offer a body for Valencia and play short passes to him while Evra was more prone to crossing in and providing genuine offensive spark. He could be afforded the space to do so by Park playing so centrally compared to Valencia.

The second, and final, thing to note is that a winger cutting into the middle of the pitch needs space himself, and this space is usually taken up by the striker. To create the space necessary the striker may need to drop deep, playing a false nine role (a term to be featured for another day). I remarked before Manchester City’s three-nil drubbing of Liverpool that if Roberto Mancini inverts Adam Johnson and James Milner he will win. He did and they did. The reason being that City’s striker, Carlos Tevez, drops extremely deep which leaves a giant hole where a classic striker would play. This space can then be filled by either a rampaging central midfielder such as Gareth Barry did on their first goal, or by one of the wingers cutting in. In this particular match and the way Liverpool set up City’s central midfielders found more joy in the centre of the park than Milner and Johnson did, but it will be interesting to see how Mancini’s squad continues to play.

Inverting one or both wings springs a set of problems for the other manager to deal with and can often confuse the opposing team. At the highest level it is now commonplace and the best in the world are no strangers to it, but I encourage managers and coaches at local youth levels to try it with their squads. It is something my friend and I often do when we coach that helps lead to success and broadens the minds of young players.

Advertisements

9 responses to “Featured Term: Inverted Winger

  1. Although I wholeheartedly disagree with the title of this blog I do hope that you’ll continue to put forth more articles of this here caliber. Bear in mind though that without a designated target working the offside trap, you have just effectively given up on the space between the lines. Space you cannot hope to recuperate by having your fullbacks charge beyond the inverted wingers, as you rightfully noted 😉

  2. Thanks for the comment, exciting to get the first one! I don’t disagree with your point re: space and I feel we could argue about this for a while which is basically what this blog is here to do. After watching Pazzini for Sampdoria and Jelen for Auxerre these past two days I might have a place for them in my squad.

    I must say I wish I could read your website, from what I can make out it looks nice. I enjoyed the video under the article titled ‘WM-​​Taktikbericht: Ein Zwischenfazit’ even without understanding the speaker, I am very much a proponent of dividing the pitch into zones.

    Anyway thanks again, I am enjoying writing these articles and I hope to find the time to continue!

  3. Jelen’s finish for the goal last night was outstanding!

    “Some attacking players who are not exactly wingers but nonetheless often find themselves on their ‘non favoured’ side include Ronaldinho, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Lionel Messi. ”

    Where do you think Ronaldo’s best position is?

    This also may sound simplistic but do you think that there is a possibility that full backs might ‘tighten up’ alongside their centrebacks to encourage the inverted winger to go down the line and get a cross in with their weaker foot? This is an obvious tactic but they can sometimes be forgotten!

    • re Ronaldo: When he was in his best form he seemed to be playing as the highest man centrally. I know that sounds like he was playing striker but that’s too simplistic, when he plays centrally, like Messi, he does so much more. If I was Ronaldo’s manager I would play him up front with a second striker behind him (e.g. Tevez) or wide left in a lopsided shape similiar to Cassano at Sampdoria.

      re fullbacks: I think this does naturally happen sometimes and it can stifle the winger, but this means that space was created. If the team has someone to fill that space (i.e. attacking fullback) then they regain the advantage. Another solution I’ve read and thought about myself is an inverted fullback. I know this sounds like this craze is getting out of hand but if you’re a left back who keeps getting cut in onto your right foot wouldn’t you be more comfortable if you were right footed? I’m not sure how much help it would be but when I play I’m more comfortable defending with my stronger foot.

      And again, thanks for the comment! I like that you cover MLS on your site. I’m actually from Canada and will cover as much TFC as I can, I missed their CL match because I had a game to play myself. It sounded like a rather interesting match…

  4. Inverted full back! I like it, maybe write a post on it further down the line? Someone like Phillipe Lahm comes to mind although I’m sure that there are many others that could do it.

    I can’t help thinking that playing Ronaldo starting from a wide right position is the best way to play him. No defensive responsibility. When he gets the ball he can shoot or cross easily. He can play centrally but he doesn’t have the guile/intelligence of a Messi to find pockets to play in.

    • You make good points regarding Ronaldo, I can’t disagree with them. I think it’s impossible for us to simply pick a position for him without taking into account the shape of the rest of the side and the players around him.

      As for linking, absolutely! I’m not going to link every site I see but I really enjoy your covering of the lesser known leagues, I really enjoyed the article Singh and Norway and like I said I love that you cover MLS. I’m Polish and living in Canada so I hope to cover the Polish Ekstraklasa and MLS in a way that isn’t accessible. There aren’t a lot of great English language sites about Polish soccer (polishfootballonline is the best) and no one who follows the MLS is very good at covering the tactics of it (that I’ve seen yet). Thanks for liking the blog, I really had no idea if anyone would even read it when I started, let alone like it and want to link it!

  5. Also would you be interested in exchanging links? I will add one to my site if you do?

  6. Excellent stuff, I’ve added a link pointing to the site. This should help the site get indexed by Google as currently it isn’t (check out ‘site:https://thefutureisstrikerless.wordpress.com‘ in Google.)

    Yeah we have some excellent writers on the blog. Over a great variety of countries.

    Look forward to reading more!

  7. Pingback: Goals from the Side

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s